Skip to main content

Arbitration

Arbitral Proceedings · Commercial Arbitration · ADR

Arbitration is a private dispute-resolution process in which the parties submit their dispute to one or more arbitrators whose decision (the "award") is binding and enforceable in court. It is the main alternative to litigation for commercial contracts, and international awards are enforceable in 170+ countries under the 1958 New York Convention.

What an arbitration clause actually does

An arbitration clause sends disputes out of the public court system and into a private forum. The parties agree in advance on the seat (legal place) of arbitration, the institution (ICC, LCIA, AAA, SCC, HKIAC, or ad-hoc), the language, the number of arbitrators, and how they are selected. Once triggered, the arbitrator runs the procedure, hears evidence, and issues a binding award. Unlike court judgments, arbitration awards are routinely enforceable across borders — that is the single biggest reason international commercial contracts prefer arbitration over litigation.

Why it matters

The arbitration clause decides where a future dispute will be fought, who will decide it, in what language, and under what rules — years before anyone knows a dispute is coming. A poorly drafted clause can send you to an unfavourable seat, stuck with an inappropriate arbitrator count, or worse, render the clause itself unenforceable. Contracts that skip arbitration and rely on court litigation lose the New York Convention advantage: a US court judgment is hard to enforce in Germany; an ICC arbitration award against a German company is routinely enforced there.

Common pitfalls

  • 1.Pathological clause — vague drafting ("disputes may be arbitrated") that courts refuse to enforce as mandatory arbitration.
  • 2.Wrong seat — picking a jurisdiction where courts are hostile to arbitration or slow to enforce awards.
  • 3.Institution vs ad-hoc mismatch — ad-hoc (no institution) can be cheaper but fragile without experienced counsel; institution rules add cost but structure.
  • 4.Three arbitrators for a small dispute — tribunal costs triple and scheduling becomes nearly impossible. Sole arbitrator is the default for straightforward commercial disputes.
  • 5.No carve-out for injunctive relief — if you might need an urgent court order (IP infringement, confidentiality breach), reserve that right in the clause.

Frequently asked questions

Is arbitration cheaper than court litigation?
Not necessarily. Arbitrator fees and institution fees often exceed court costs, especially for a tribunal of three. Arbitration can be faster and more confidential, but the cost advantage depends on the dispute value and jurisdiction. For small disputes, court is often cheaper; for cross-border disputes, arbitration almost always wins on enforceability.
Can an arbitration award be appealed?
Generally no — that is one of arbitration's defining features. Courts can set aside awards only on narrow grounds: procedural unfairness, arbitrator bias, award outside the scope of the arbitration agreement, or public policy. Substantive errors of fact or law usually cannot be appealed.
What is the New York Convention and why does it matter?
The 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards is the treaty that makes international arbitration awards enforceable in 170+ countries. Its courts routinely enforce awards from foreign seats — a huge advantage over court judgments, which depend on fragmented bilateral enforcement treaties.

Review your arbitration clauses with Attorly

Upload any contract and get a per-clause breakdown of arbitration seat, institution, arbitrator selection, language, and carve-outs — in under 60 seconds.

Analyse the contract