Skip to main content
Benchmarks

We measure our legal AI in public

Every release of Attorly is benchmarked against corpus-verified legal-retrieval tasks across four jurisdictions. The latest results — passes, failures, and method — are published here.

Latest results

100%
Pass rate
9
Tasks graded
4
Jurisdictions
Aug 4, 2026
Last run
Build dc6f821c6
JurisdictionTasksPassedPass rate
Norway88100%
Sweden11100%
Denmark00
Germany00

How the benchmark works

Each task describes a legal matter the way a real user would — a case summary or a research question — and asks our retrieval pipeline for the most relevant legal sources. The task passes only if the statutes that actually govern the matter surface in the results.

Queries deliberately never name the governing statute — naming it would make retrieval trivial and measure nothing. Every task is verified against the official legal corpus of its jurisdiction before it is added.

Governing law surfaces

Every statute that governs the matter must appear in the retrieved sources. Missing the controlling law fails the task.

Noise stays out

Known tangential sources — plausible-looking but irrelevant statutes — must not appear. Surfacing noise fails the task.

Rank discipline

For selected tasks, the governing statute must appear at the top of the results, not merely somewhere in them.

Per-task results

Task descriptions are shown in English — they are the benchmark's source data, identical across all languages.

TaskJurisdictionResult
no-tenancy-depositTenancy: landlord withholding a deposit after move-outNorwayPass
no-criminal-embezzlementCriminal defence: gross embezzlement (the Fredrik regression guard)NorwayPass
no-employment-dismissalEmployment: contested dismissal / unfair terminationNorwayPass
no-family-custodyFamily: parental responsibility and where the child livesNorwayPass
no-sale-defectContract: defect in a commercial sale of goodsNorwayPass
no-company-sharesCorporate: shareholder dispute in a limited companyNorwayPass
no-personal-dataPrivacy: unlawful processing of personal dataNorwayPass
no-inheritanceInheritance: distribution of an estate and forced shareNorwayPass
se-employment-dismissalEmployment: contested dismissal (Lagen om anställningsskydd)SwedenPass
se-consumer-saleConsumer: defective goods purchased by a consumer (Konsumentköplagen)SwedenSkipped
se-company-sharesCorporate: minority shareholder dispute (Aktiebolagslagen)SwedenSkipped
se-discriminationEmployment: workplace discrimination (Diskrimineringslagen)SwedenSkipped
se-family-custodyFamily: custody and residence after separation (Föräldrabalken)SwedenSkipped
se-criminal-embezzlementCriminal defence: embezzlement (Brottsbalken)SwedenSkipped
dk-employment-dismissalEmployment: salaried-employee dismissal (Funktionærloven)DenmarkSkipped
dk-sale-defectSale: defective goods and right to reject (Købeloven)DenmarkSkipped
dk-company-sharesCorporate: shareholder dispute in a capital company (Selskabsloven)DenmarkSkipped
dk-family-custodyFamily: parental responsibility and residence (Forældreansvarsloven)DenmarkSkipped
dk-inheritanceInheritance: estate distribution and forced share (Arveloven)DenmarkSkipped
dk-criminal-embezzlementCriminal defence: embezzlement (Straffeloven)DenmarkSkipped
de-employment-dismissalEmployment: unfair dismissal protection (Kündigungsschutzgesetz)GermanySkipped
de-criminal-embezzlementCriminal defence: embezzlement (Strafgesetzbuch)GermanySkipped
de-sale-defectSale: defective goods and buyer remedies (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch)GermanySkipped

What this does and doesn't show

  • This is an in-house benchmark, authored and graded by us. It is not an independent evaluation — treat it as our own quality bar, published so you can hold us to it.
  • It measures legal-source retrieval — whether the right law surfaces for a matter. It does not measure the quality of drafted text or end-to-end answers.
  • Results are produced automatically for every deployed release and published unedited, including failures.